Threads / Really? Are the Wizards better without Gilbert Arenas.

« Older  wizards wizards  Newer »

mariners5

Photobucket, FL

194735.25 Points
Level 8: Immortal
Ignore User
I believe not; Gilbert Arenas when healthy he is one of the best players in the NBA. He tried to help his team by coming but everyone knew he wasn't at 100%. I'm asking this because I saw a poll that asked this and it said 67% the Wiz were better without Agent0; was wondering what you Rootzooers thought?

posted on 1/5/08

Reply
Replies (7)
Reply to this thread

Yanks27

New RootOff,READ IT, NJ

5323.25 Points
Level 4: All Star
Ignore User
They have shown that if he is not 100% they are better without him. If he is 100% healthy, the of course they are better with him. He is not healthy yet so at this point they would be better without him.

posted on 1/5/08

Onlineking booker

, TX

39114.75 Points
Level 6: Living Legend
Ignore User
I believe so only coz the've proved to be better without him

posted on 1/5/08

mariners5

Photobucket, FL

194735.25 Points
Level 8: Immortal
Ignore User
Now, but when he's healthy this three is as good as the Boston Big 3.

posted on 1/5/08

Online50 CENT

Detroit , MI

123618.75 Points
Level 8: Immortal
Ignore User
YES! he sits his ass down and waits till he's 110% or no less! The whole year tey've showen they ca win without him. They don't need him now. He slows the down.

posted on 1/5/08

AGENTZER00

Go Fish!!!, NJ

134115.50 Points
Level 8: Immortal
Ignore User
if you believe not, why ask the question? the answer is so simple...

posted on 1/5/08

mariners5

Photobucket, FL

194735.25 Points
Level 8: Immortal
Ignore User
I believe not, but other Zooers believe so.

posted on 1/5/08

RayRiceHallofFame

Flagstaff , AZ

4615.75 Points
Level 3: Veteran
Ignore User
I think your right about Gilbert Arenas is a good player for the Wizards only. Also dont think he is one of the best players in the nba because he gets injured way to much. He is like #12

posted on 1/5/08

Replies (7)
Reply to this thread